Facing public pressure, palm oil firms are going green: study

Commodities & Futures
Facing public pressure, palm oil firms are going green: study © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A worker arranges palm oil fruit bunches on a truck at a factory in Tanjung Karang

By Maytaal Angel

LONDON (Reuters) – Of the seven commodities sectors driving deforestation, palm oil companies are doing the most to alleviate their environmental impact following years of public pressure, a study by a global environmental disclosure group shows.

The CDP study, which will be released on Monday but was given to Reuters in advance, is likely to ramp up pressure on commodity companies to go green given the progress in palm oil, which is widely blamed by environmentalists for much of the destruction of tropical rainforests.

Based on responses from more than 550 leading companies in the agri-commodities sector, the study found nearly all who use or produce palm oil are taking at least one industry accepted measure to address deforestation, such as having sufficiently ambitious traceability targets.

Companies involved with rubber, by contrast, are doing the least, while the coffee and cattle products sector also perform poorly, the study found.

“Palm oil has been the subject of public campaigns in recent years. Companies see palm oil as a reputational risk,” it noted.

CDP measures the environmental risk and impact of more than 10,000 companies, cities, states and regions on behalf of leading global investors.

Sareh Forouzesh, associate director of forests at CDP said: “There is a solid business case for companies (to source) commodities sustainably.”

Companies are requested to make disclosures through CDP because they use or produce the seven commodities that drive deforestation: timber, palm oil, soy, cattle, rubber, cocoa and coffee.

However, only a third of companies asked to disclose to the CDP study did so. This still represents significant progress compared to previous studies but also shows a gap in the commodity industry’s transparency and, most likely, in its actions to tackle deforestation.

Scientists say protecting forests is one of the cheapest and most effective ways to curb climate change because trees suck in carbon dioxide, the main gas heating up the planet.

According to the United Nations, 10 million hectares of forest were destroyed annually in the five years since 2015.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Commodities & Futures News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *